Factores de riesgo para mortalidad en pacientes con infección por Clostridium difficile / Risk factors for mortality in patients with Clostridium difficile infection

Resumen Introducción: La infección por Clostridium difficile (ICD) es causa de diarrea hospitalaria potencialmente letal. Objetivo: Identificar los factores de riesgo para mortalidad en pacientes hospitalizados con ICD. Método: Estudio transversal y retrospectivo. Se analizaron factores de riesgo: edad, comorbilidades, estado nutricional, antecedente y uso de antibióticos, de inhibidores de bomba de protones, esteroides, inmunosupresores, quimioterapia y desarrollo de lesión renal aguda (LRA). Resultados: Fueron evaluados 68 casos (incidencia de 25.7/10 000 egresos hospitalarios). La edad fue de 51.4 ± 19.37 años y la mortalidad de 22.2 %. La desnutrición moderada a severa mostró RM = 20.15, IC 95 % = 1.13-35, p = 0.004; el uso de más de dos antibióticos, RM = 1.61, IC 95 % = 0.39-6.65, p = 0.01; la LRA determinada por elevación de los niveles de creatinina, RM = 1.34, IC 95 % = 0.09-2.21, p = 0.02; la hipotensión con uso de vasopresores, RM = 1.28, IC 95 % = 0.30-1.23, p = 0.001; y el desarrollo de falla orgánica múltiple (FOM), RM = 1.13, IC 95 % = 0.31-4.92, p = 0.002. Conclusiones: La desnutrición moderada a severa, el uso de más de dos antibióticos, la LRA, la hipotensión con uso de vasopresores y la FOM se asocian con incremento en la mortalidad en pacientes con ICD.

Abstract Introduction: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) causes potentially lethal diarrhea. Objective: To identify the risk factors for mortality in hospitalized patients with CDI. Method: Cross-sectional, retrospective study. The analyzed risk factors were age, comorbidities, nutritional status, past and current use of antibiotics, proton pump inhibitors, steroids, immunosuppressive therapy and chemotherapy, as well as development of acute kidney injury (AKI). Results: Sixty-eight cases were assessed. Mean age was 51.4 ± 19.37 years. Mortality was 22.2 %. Moderate to severe undernutrition (Odds ratio [OR] = 20.15; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.13-35; p = 0.004), use of more than 2 antibiotics (OR = 1.61; 95% CI = 0.39-6.65; p = 0.01), AKI as determined by creatinine levels (OR = 1.34; 95% CI = 0.09-2.21; p = 0.02), hypotension with vasopressor use (OR = 1.28; 95% CI = 0.30-1.23; p = 0.001) and multiple organ failure (OR = 1.13; 95% CI = 0.31-4.92; p = 0.002) were associated with mortality. Conclusions: CDI represents an important problem in hospitalized patients and confers them an additional morbidity and mortality risk.

Application of the ATLAS score for evaluating the severity of Clostridium difficile infection in teaching hospitals in Mexico

Background: For clinicians, a practical bedside tool for severity assessment and prognosis of patients with Clostridium difficileinfection is a highly desirable unmet medical need.Setting: Two general teaching hospitals in northeast Mexico.Population: Adult patients with C. difficileinfection.Methods: Prospective observational study.Results: Patients included had a median of 48 years of age, 54% of male gender and an average of 24.3 days length of hospital stay. Third generation cephalosporins were the antibiotics most commonly used prior to C. difficileinfection diagnosis. Patients diagnosed with C. difficileinfection had a median ATLAS score of 4 and 56.7% of the subjects had a score between 4 and 7 points. Patients with a score of 8 through 10 points had 100% mortality.Conclusion: The ATLAS score is a potentially useful tool for the routine evaluation of patients at the time of C. difficileinfection diagnosis. At 30 days post-diagnosis, patients with a score of ≤3 points had 100% survival while all of those with scores ≥8 died. Patients with scores between 4 and 7 points had a greater probability of colectomy with an overall cure rate of 70.1%.

Rendimiento de índices pronósticos en infección asociada a Clostridium difficile grave: Análisis retrospectivo en un hospital universitario / Performance of prognostic index in severe Clostridium difficile-associated infection: Retrospective analysis in a university hospital

Introduction: By consensus severe, Clostridium difficile-associated infection (CDAI) is one that results in hospitalization in ICU, colectomy or death within 30 days. Multiple prognostic indices (IP) attempt to predict these adverse events. Objective: To evaluate the performance of 4 PI in predicting severe CDI. Methods: Hospitalized patients ≥ 18 years old with ICD were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with recurrent infection or hematological cancer were excluded. Four PI were evaluated: UPMC version 1, Calgary version 1, Hines VA and Calgary version 2. Results: Seven of 81 patients (8.1%) met the definition of severe CDI. Positive predicted value (PPV) and negative predicted value (NPV) of PI ranged from 20-75% and 91.3-95.7%, respectively. Only Hines VA index had a satisfactory Kappa index (0.74; 95% CI 0.41-1) with a PPV of 75% and NPV of 95,7%. However, because of the variables included, this PI could be calculated only in 32.6% of patients. Conclusion: Hines VA index has the best predicted value and agreement to rule out a severe CDI. Like others PI it has the limitation of including difficult variables to assess in all patients and tends to overestimate an unfavorable course.

Introducción: Por consenso, la infección asociada a Clostridium difficile (IACD) grave es aquella que resulta en hospitalización en unidad de cuidados intensivos, colectomía o muerte dentro de 30 días. Múltiples índices pronósticos (IP) intentan predecir estos eventos adversos. Objetivo: evaluar el rendimiento de cuatro IP en la predicción de IACD grave. Metodología: pacientes hospitalizados ≥ 18 años con IACD fueron evaluados retrospectivamente. Se excluyeron pacientes con infección recurrente o cáncer hematológico. Se evaluaron cuatro IP: UPMC versión 1, Calgary versión 1, Hines VA y Calgary versión 2. Resultados: Siete de 81 pacientes (8,1%) presentaron una IACD grave. El valor predictor positivo (VPP) y valor predictor negativo (VPN) de los IP varió entre 20-75% y 91,3-95,7%, respectivamente. Sólo el índice de Hines VA tuvo un índice Kappa satisfactorio (0,74;IC 95% 0,46-1) con un VPP de 75% y un VPN de 95,7%. Sin embargo, por las variables incluidas en este IP, sólo pudo ser calculado en 32,6% de los pacientes. Conclusión: El índice de Hines VA presenta el mejor valor predictor y concordancia para descartar una IACD grave. Como otros IP, tiene la limitación de incluir variables difícilmente evaluables en todos los pacientes y tiende a sobreestimar un curso desfavorable.